It is necessary to mention the basic features of the claims. Although there remains some disagreement on doctrinal notions of claim or action, however it is now clear that define the majority position accepts the claim as an act of complaint. Specifically, at the same time cataloging to the action as an abstract right. This preliminary distinction is key to understanding the differences between claim after substantial and procedural claim has been developing modern doctrine. So Juan Monroy Galvez has defined substantial or material claim as the act of requiring something to another before the start of a process, provided that the case has the quality of justice or magazine legal relevance. Instead the claim procedure is the manifestation of will by which a subject of rights requires something to another route through the state courts. This transformation of the material claim claim claim procedure occurs when the material is not satisfied and the holder using the right of action makes procedural claim. This difference marked by the right of action has full correspondence with the outline of the legal relationship between the parties substantially drawn substantial and procedural legal relationships drawn between the litigants, with the former gives rise to the claim material and the second to procedural claim. The claim procedure has been conceptualized by Adolfo Alvarado Velloso as “declaration of will made in a lawsuit (legal terms) by which the actor (pretender) hopes that the judge issued after a decision process effectively and favorably resolve the dispute submitted to it to their attention.